Appendix A CDS/CDH

section (which is being updated over time) on mmswiki.is for more information. Remember, as with MMS1, always use the Three Golden Rules of MMS (see pages 83-84) if you are using CDS or CDH. With that said, here is some information regarding some of the differences between CDS, CDH and MMS1.

Over the years I have received a great deal of feedback both from Health Ministers around the world who are very active in helping others recover their health, and from individuals themselves, regarding the three forms of MMS (MMS1, CDS and CDH) and how they have worked for them. I want to make it clear that we have seen all forms of MMS help people recover their health. Nevertheless, there are significant differences with each one. As MMS1 has already been covered extensively in this book, below is a brief synopsis of CDS and CDH. CDS CDS was developed by a cattle rancher with direct support and cooperation of Andreas Kalcker. (It was initially developed for use with animals.) CDS is chlorine dioxide gas in distilled water and contains no sodium chlorite or activator. It has to be made up ahead of time through one of several distillation processes and ideally stored in the refrigerator. A pre-made mixture can be convenient. Depending on how CDS is handled, it can last several weeks or even longer. While CDS is relatively easy to make, there are many variables that can have an effect on the end product. Things such as temperature, climate, altitude, humidity, air pressure, and what type of equipment is used can make a big difference in the resulting CDS. For example, if there is too much air in the bottle or jar it is stored in, it can lose potency. Each time you open the bottle, outgassing occurs which will lessen potency, and so on. Learning the techniques on how to make and handle CDS is not all that difficult if one is dedicated to doing so—but close attention must be given to the details.

CDS is fully activated—there is no residual sodium chlorite left in the solution—which is considered by some to be an advantage. It can be easier on the stomach, and many consider it to have little taste compared to MMS1. At low doses this is true. However, to recover health from serious disease, it is usually necessary to take high level doses of CDS. When this happens, taste and/or burning in the throat can enter into the equation, and sometimes a Herxheimer reaction. CDS can be helpful for sensitive people, who for one reason or another cannot tolerate MMS1. We have seen that for some people starting out on CDS can be beneficial to help one become accustomed to taking MMS1. The Starting Procedure with MMS1 has eliminated the need for this in most cases. The above stated observations are regarding taking CDS internally. Some people feel that CDS works best with treating external conditions and many have had success with this. The main important observation that myself and other extensive users of CDS (who have worked close with me) have noticed, is something which I call the plateau phenomena. Those working with autistic children used CDS exclusively for one year. At first it was easy to see the children were improving, but as time went on and the children continued to take CDS, the majority seemed to hit a plateau where they were not improving. They came to a standstill. But when these same children were put back on taking MMS1, they again started to improve. Several Health Ministers and others, when using CDS for a variety of diseases, including cancer, have also reported this phenomenon. There seems to be a point when the individual hits a stalemate (this doesn’t always happen, but it often does), but when put on MMS1, they start to improve again. So, if you do use CDS, my advice would

be to be aware of the plateau phenomena and if it happens to you, switch to MMS1.

A further word on CDS: There have been differences of opinion over the years regarding the dosing amounts of CDS and the equivalent of CDS to MMS1 for use in our protocols. In the past, we have published a ratio of 1 ml of CDS at 3000 ppm equals a 3-drop dose of MMS1. I have come to believe this is very low dosing for CDS. At the same time, I have come to realize, for multiple reasons too detailed to explain here, that an exact equivalent between CDS and MMS1 is not possible to determine. This is in part due to the reasons mentioned above, the preparation and handling of CDS includes many variables. For example, you may start out with a 3000 ppm solution of CDS, but in a weeks’ time, due to out-gassing every time the bottle is opened and other factors, your solution may be getting increasingly weaker. Another reason exact equivalents are difficult to determine is due to the amount of a person’s stomach acid. Equivalents can perhaps be determined based on tests with simulated “normal” stomach acid. There are however, many things to consider, one being if the individual indeed does have “normal” stomach acid (most people who have poor health and who are in need of health recovery do not have normal stomach acid). As I have repeatedly said throughout this book, if one follows the Three Golden Rules of MMS, this will indicate if you need to increase or lower your dose. Probably the most important reason we cannot equate amounts of MMS1 and CDS is that after passing through the stomach, MMS1 still has roughly 50% unactivated sodium chlorite which passes into the human system. Because sodium chlorite has been taken for more than 80 years by hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom

swear by it, we must assume that the unactivated sodium chlorite must have some benefit to the system, in addition to the chlorine dioxide. (More on this below.) Since CDS has no sodium chlorite there is no way to make an evaluation of one against the other. CDH CDH was developed by Scott McRae and Charlotte Lackney. CDH is also “pre-made” and much easier to make than CDS. It also must be refrigerated. It lasts a couple of weeks to a month in the fridge, depending on the recipe used. CDH, like MMS1, is not totally activated, thus leaving some free sodium chlorite to continue on through the stomach into the system. I have not had extensive experience with CDH, therefore cannot say to use or not use it. We have received reports that it has produced good results for some users. My Personal Conclusion on MMS1, CDS and CDH As stated above, CDS is completely activated and contains no residual sodium chlorite in the solution. CDH and MMS1 do contain some free sodium chlorite which makes its way through the stomach into the system. Now, while some people believe the advantage to CDS is that it does not contain unactivated sodium chlorite, I have a different opinion. I believe just the opposite. Unactivated sodium chlorite alone also destroys poisons and kills pathogens. It has been sold in health food stores in the USA for 80 years and many thousands of people have had some good results from taking it. There are those who now use it without prior activation because they believe that the stomach acid is what activates it and they get a certain amount of good results.

When I first discovered MMS, it was MMS (sodium chlorite) alone that healed the first men in the jungle of malaria. As I traveled throughout the jungle helping many more people recover their health (mostly from malaria and typhoid fever), it was sodium chlorite alone that helped. But the success rate was about 60%. Through much experimentation, it wasn’t until I developed the formula further and started activating MMS that the success rate for malaria turned out to be about 98%, and about 92-94% for other diseases. It is my opinion, unactivated sodium chlorite penetrates deeper into the tissues of the body than even MMS1, according to data I have gleaned from patents issued in the last century. Unactivated sodium chlorite penetrates into the tissues in a different way than MMS1, and thus the two together seem to be more effective than either one alone. It has been very obvious to many of us that MMS1 (chlorine dioxide) along with unactivated sodium chlorite is what gets the very best results. This is anecdotal evidence, but with many thousands of people recovered, even scientists have to admit that serves as legitimate evidence. One more point to keep in mind is that suppliers of CDS and CDH unfortunately sometimes give inaccurate information on how to use them. If you do use CDS and CDH visit our site mmswiki.is for the latest information. In conclusion, I want to say that MMS in all forms continues to be a mystery at times. The important thing is to find what works best for you. Remember to always use the Three Golden Rules of MMS (pages 83-84). If using CDS or CDH, and you are not seeing desired results, carefully study Chapter 8 in this book and/or consider switching to MMS1.

Appendix B